Double Standards in International Legal Politics in the Settlement of Violations of Human Rights to the Rohingya Ethnic

Rifdatul Maziyyah; Millatus Shohihah; Sivana Amanda Diamita Syndo; Nazhif Ali Murtadho

doi:10.62039/ijldr.v1i1.1

Authors

Rifdatul Maziyyah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Millatus Shohihah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Sivana Amanda Diamita Syndo Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Nazhif Ali Murtadho Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62039/ijldr.v1i1.1

Keywords:

Keywords: Standar Ganda, Politik Hukum, Pelanggaran HAM, Etnis Rohingya., Double Standard, Legal Politics, Human Right Violation, Rohingya Ethics Group

Abstract

This article aims to identify the resolution of gross human rights violations against the Rohingya ethnic group who have been discriminated of the Myanmar Military Junta Government. The international community and political response are giving pressure and criticism about upheaval against the settlement of violations against the Rohingya. The Myanmar government rejection of accusations of gross human rights violations can be seen from the international double standards towards the settlement of the Rohingya case. This article uses the library research method, and critical analysis to understand the settlement of human rights violations against the Rohingya. The conclusion is Discrimination against this ethnic can be considered by international human rights law as a gross violation of human rights, even though Myanmar has legal arrangements for protecting human rights in force in its country. International human rights law as a political instrument has powerful in efforts to create quality international policy products including guaranteeing the implementation of respect for human rights in the world through the role of international institutions as guardians in the process of enforcing human rights violations committed by a country through various strategic steps both repressive, preventive and curative. Discrimination against the Rohingya can be seen in the application of double standards by several countries such as the Western block countries, where they seem to keep quiet about these human rights violations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aminuddin, A. (n.d.). PBB Kutuk Kekerasan terhadap Muslim Myanmar.

Apripari Irham. (n.d.). Penegakan Yurisdiksi Internasional Criminal Court atas Kejahatan Agresi Pasca Kampala Amendements Diadopsi dalam Rome Statute. Terakreditasi Nasional, SK. No. 28/E/KPT/2019, Volume 26, 540–556.

Bangsa-Bangsa, P. (1945). Piagam Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa dan Statuta Mahkamah Internasional (p. 101).

Christian Lumban Gaol, D., Nugroho, A., & Septin Puspoayu, E. (n.d.). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional.

Darmawan, J. E. (2016). Sikap Amerika Serikat Terhadap Kasus Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Di Iran Periode 2011-2014. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Dyah, E., Lestari, S., Latifah, E., & Adiastuti, A. (2022). Meningkatkan Daya Ikat Hukum Internasional: Kajian Filosofis bukan sistem hukum. Kesimpulan Hart tersebut didasarkan pada perbandingan tatanan hukum. 1, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v29i1.1804

Fabiana Meijon Fadul. (2019). DISKRIMINASI ETNIS ROHINGYA OLEH PEMERINTAH MYANMAR DI TENGAH TEKANAN INTERNASIONAL.

Ida Bagus Wiyasa Putra. (2001). Tanggung Jawab Negara terhadap Dampak Komersialisasi Ruang Angkasa. Refika Aditama.

Indonesia, C. (2022). Soal Tuduhan Standar Ganda, Beda Invasi Rusia ke Ukraina dengan Israel. Cnn.Indonesia.Com.

Juwana, H. (2012). Hukum Internasional Sebagai Instrumen Politik: Beberapa Pengalaman Indonesia Sebagai Studi Kasus. Arena Hukum, 5(2), 108. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2012.00502.4

Kajian UGM terhadap kasus Rohingya.pdf. (n.d.).

Kurniawan, N. (2018). Kasus Rohingya dan Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4), 880. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1449

Literate, S., & Indonesia, J. I. (2020). View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk. 274–282.

Majelis Umum PBB. (1948). Deklarasi Universal Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 4(1), 133–168.

Prisilia, T. S. (2021). Peran Perserikatan Bangsa-bangsa Dalam Penanganan Kasus Kejahatan Genosida Menurut Hukum Internasional. Lex Administratum, IX(6), 25–34.

Puspa Ayu Saraswati. (2018). PERAN PEREMPUAN DALAM RESOLUSI KONFLIK ROHINGYA DI MYANMAR Women’s Role in Resolution of Rohingya Conflict in Myanmar. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Ratri, S. R. (2019). STANDAR GANDA GENDER DALAM KELUARGA (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta). In Αγαη (Vol. 8, Issue 5). https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/.

Rohmayni, S. (2013). Analisis Framing Konflik Muslim Rohingya Pada Harian Republika. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Pub. L. No. 1998, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court 407 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511975035.013

Setiawan, I. P., & Suryanti, M. S. D. (2021). Keterlibatan Asean dalam Menangani Konflik Myanmar (Studi Kasus: Konflik Etnis Rohingya 2017 – 2019). POLITICOS: Jurnal Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 1(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.22225/politicos.1.2.2021.83-97

Setiyani, & Setiyono, J. (2022). Penerapan Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Negara Terhadap Kasus Pelanggaran HAM. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(2), 1–14.