The word limit for the submission is 4.500-6.000 words, one column format A4 paper. The manuscripts should contain: title; abstract; three to five keywords; introduction; method (for original research articles); analysis and discussion; conclusion; and bibliography (download the article template at the journal website).

Title

THE TITLE ARE WRITTEN IN GARAMOND/BOLD/16 PT AND PREFERABLY NOT MORE THAN 14 WORDS. Put author(s) name(s), e-mail, and affiliations under the title.

Abstract

Abstract must be written in English. Garamond (12pt) is preferably between 150-250 words. The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. This abstract should provide a brief introduction to the problem, objective of paper, followed by a statement regarding the methodology if the manuscript is taken from research report and a brief summary of results (IMRaD Structure).

Keywords

Keywords are arranged by alphabetically and should have at least three to five keywords and should refer to the title.

Introduction

The Article’s introduction should be clear and provide for the issue to be discussed in the manuscript.  Before the objective, authors should provide an adequate background, and very short literature survey in order to record the existing conditions, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what you want to achieve (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper. At the end of the paragraph, the author/s should end with a comment on the significance concerning identification of the issue   and objective of the research.

The manuscript written by the author whose English is the second language needs to be proofread. Ignore to this requirement results in the rejection of the manuscript.

The Article’s introduction should be clear and provide for the issue to be discussed in the manuscript.  Before the objective, authors should provide an adequate background, and very short literature survey in order to record the existing conditions, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what you want to achieve (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper. At the end of the paragraph, the author/s should end with a comment on the significance concerning identification of the issue   and objective of the research.  The manuscript written by the author whose English is the second language needs to be proofread. Ignore to this requirement results in the rejection of the manuscript.

The body of paper must be elaborated between 4.500 - 6.000 words (maximum) including abstract and references. The literature review contains descriptions of theories, concepts, findings, and other research materials obtained from reference materials to be used as the basis for research activities. The description in the literature review is directed to develop a clear framework of thinking about solving the problems that have been described in the formulation of the problem. The literature review shows a “knowledge map” related to the topic of study, provides theories and concepts that can sharpen the analysis and relies on reputable journal articles published no later than the last 10 years and cites articles on “giants”. The end of the literature review also identifies the logical reasons why this research is important.

Research Method

This method is written in descriptive and should provide a statement regarding the methodology of the research, include the type of research, research approach, a source of data and analysis method. The author should explain the mechanism to analyze the sharia issues. This method as much as possible to give an idea to the reader through the method used, this method is optional, only for an original research article. (For Conceptual Ideas without Research Method).

Result and discussions

The First Aspect of the Discussion

Here, you may discuss every aspect of the issue one by one. It is necessary to build an argument and provide original data that can be discussed and compared to the research and works of other scholars. In other words, the way to discuss an issue here is by combining the data and the discussion. So, it is not recommended to separate merely the data description from the analysis on it.

Every quotation is written down in a specific way that can be identified as a “quotation” different from your original text.

The Second Aspect of the Discussion

If a citation is taken from a journal article, it must be like this (Sabri, 2023); Examples of references other than those: website, reports, book chapters, a master thesis, and a Ph.D. thesis. Please provide a complete internet URL whenever available along with the date of access.

The Third Aspect of the Discussion, and so on

It is possible to add sections as needed. A section may consist of several sub-sections, typed in bold-italic and numbered list style, like the following example.

Then, if the data translation requires a table or chart, it can be included in this sub-discussion.

Object	Font	Alignment	Space above	Space below
Title	12pt bold	Centered	0pt	12pt
Author(s)	12pt	Centered	12pt	12pt
Addresses	12pt	Centered	0pt	0pt
Heading1	12pt	Left	12pt	6pt
Heading2	12pt	Left	12pt	6pt
Heading3	12pt	Left	12pt	6pt
Body	12pt	Justified	0pt	0pt
Bullet	12pt	Justified	0pt	0pt
Table title	12pt	Centered	12pt	6pt
Figure title	12pt	Centered	3pt	6pt

Table Titles

Table 1. Formatting Rules:¬ 12pt, Garamond

Conclusion

Conclusion contains a description that should answer the problem(s) raised and answer the objectives of research. Provide a clear and concise conclusion. Do not repeat the Abstract or simply describe the results of the research. Give a clear explanation regarding the possible application and/or suggestions related to the research findings.

Bibliography

References of your manuscript must be up to date (in the last of 5 to 10 years and minimum of 30 references that 80% of the references is from primary sources/journal of international repute) and your reference can be accessed by anyone. Authors are responsible for ensuring that the information in each reference is complete and accurate. All references should be cited within the text; otherwise, these references will be automatically removed.

Citation: Use of a tool such as Mendeley or zotero for reference management and formatting, and choose American Phsicological Assosiation (APA) style 7^th edition. For examples: (Bapak B, personal communication, 2 June 2024; Irianto & Nurcahyo, 2006; Jaman, 2020; Sabri et al., 2024; Survei LSI: KPK Paling Dipercaya Rakyat, Parpol Terendah - Nasional Katadata.Co.Id, n.d.)

Bapak B. (2024, June 2). Dialogue with a father whose daughters have undergone FGM at YY1 [Personal communication].

Irianto, S., & Nurcahyo, L. I. (2006). Perempuan di Persidangan: Pemantauan Peradilan Berperspektif Perempuan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Jaman, N. (2020). Implications Of Polygamy Practices On Positive Law In Indonesia. Prophetic Law Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol2.iss1.art2

Sabri, F. A., Rohmah, L. F., Ghufron, M., Hadi, M. N., Musafa’ah, S., & Nadhifah, N. A. (2024). The Reality of Violence Against Wives: Dynamics of Social Settlement and Support in Lamongan, East Java. Mazahib, 23(1), 237–270. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v23i1.7512

Survei LSI: KPK Paling Dipercaya Rakyat, Parpol Terendah—Nasional Katadata.co.id. (n.d.). Retrieved 22 September 2023, from https://katadata.co.id/desysetyowati/berita/5e9a50324b392/survei-lsi-kpk-paling-dipercaya-rakyat-parpol-terendah

Please Download Template